Per Drop More Crop (Micro Irrigation) — PMKSY

The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here.

“Table 1: Indicative cost of Drip Irrigation System for calculation of subsidy”

The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here. For low-penetration states and hilly states including the North-East, the guidelines say 15% and 25% higher costs “may be taken” — a state’s choice, so we use the printed cost.

“Table 4: Indicative Cost of Portable Sprinkler Irrigation System”

The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here. For low-penetration states and hilly states including the North-East, the guidelines say 15% and 25% higher costs “may be taken” — a state’s choice, so we use the printed cost.

“Table 5: Indicative cost of Micro Sprinkler Irrigation System”

The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here. For low-penetration states and hilly states including the North-East, the guidelines say 15% and 25% higher costs “may be taken” — a state’s choice, so we use the printed cost.

“Table 6:- Indicative Cost of Mini Sprinkler Irrigation System”

The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here. For low-penetration states and hilly states including the North-East, the guidelines say 15% and 25% higher costs “may be taken” — a state’s choice, so we use the printed cost.

“Table 7: Indicative Cost of Semi-Permanent Sprinkler System”

The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here. For low-penetration states and hilly states including the North-East, the guidelines say 15% and 25% higher costs “may be taken” — a state’s choice, so we use the printed cost.

“Table: 9 Indicative Cost of Large Volume Sprinklers(Rain–gun)”

A cluster is 50 ha or more in mainland states and 20 ha in NE and hilly states, on contiguous land; the assistance comes through the organisation (cl. 7.27.1). The same 55% applies to sprinkler systems in the cluster. The cost counted is the lower of your quotation and the indicative cost in the guidelines for your system, spacing and area, including GST (cl. 20.1). Up to 5 hectares per beneficiary (cl. 7.9), and not again on the same land for seven years (cl. 7.10). Between the printed plot sizes the cost is worked out on a straight line, as the guideline’s own example shows (cl. 9.5); for a spacing not in the table, the guideline averages the nearest spacings — pick the nearest one here.

“7.27.1 … Water User Associations/Groups, Farmer Producer Organizations, Cooperative societies, Self-Help Groups, Growers’ Associations etc. shall be encouraged to adopt Micro Irrigation in a cluster. In such cases the beneficiary will be entitled to avail financial assistance through their respective organizations / bodies. The total financial assistance available to the individual beneficiary in the group would be 55% under the scheme.”

“May be allowed” — the state decides. States are to implement at least 5% of their micro-irrigation target through FPOs (cl. 7.27.2).

“Such farmers groups/organizations may be allowed to avail an administrative/institutional charges @ 3% of the cost of the Cluster.”

Given “on the then existing rate of subsidy” — the micro-irrigation rate of cl. 20.1 — on the lower of your quotation and the indicative price in Annexure XII. You can take a fertiliser tank or a venturi or an automated dosing system, not more than one (13.1(i)). Any other optional item is at your own cost (13.4).

“13.1 … The provision is kept to provide the said component on the then existing rate of subsidy to the beneficiary; if required & provided. These components are: i. Fertilizer tank … ii. Sand filters/media filters … iii. Hydro Cyclone Filters/Sand Separators … iv. Drip Line Winder”

For a pond or tank without lining the cost counted is 30% less (Annexure XIII, item 1) — the figure here is for a lined one. Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“1 Water harvesting system ,Diggi for individuals/community — 50% of cost (Construction cost - Rs. 125 for plain/ Rs. 150 per cum for hilly areas) limited to Rs. 75000 for plain areas and Rs. 90000 for hilly areas including lining. For smaller size of the ponds/ dug wells, cost admissible on pro rata basis. Cost for non-lined ponds/tanks will be 30% less.”

The guideline does not list which areas are hilly; your state decides. For a pond or tank without lining the cost counted is 30% less (Annexure XIII, item 1) — the figure here is for a lined one. Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“1 Water harvesting system ,Diggi for individuals/community — 50% of cost (Construction cost - Rs. 125 for plain/ Rs. 150 per cum for hilly areas) limited to Rs. 75000 for plain areas and Rs. 90000 for hilly areas including lining. For smaller size of the ponds/ dug wells, cost admissible on pro rata basis. Cost for non-lined ponds/tanks will be 30% less.”

Only where the Central Ground Water Board has not classed the area as over-exploited, critical or semi-critical (Annexure XIII, item 2). Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“2 Construction of Tube wells / Bore wells (Shallow / Medium) only in areas which are not categorized under over-exploited, critical & semi- critical zones by Central Ground Water Board. — 50% of the total cost of installation limited to Rs. 25,000 / - per unit”

Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“3 Restoration / Renovation of small tank — 50% of the cost of renovation limited to Rs. 15,000 / - per unit”

Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“4 Recharge of defunct bore well — 50% of the cost of recharging limited to Rs. 5000 / - per unit”

Item 5 does not print an area limit; we count at most 5 hectares, the PDMC limit per beneficiary for the micro-irrigation system it serves (cl. 7.9). Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“5 Pipe/pre-cast distribution system — 50% of the cost of system limited to Rs. 10,000 / - per ha”

Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“6 Water Lifting Devices (Electric, Diesel, wind / Solar) — 50% of the cost of installation limited to Rs. 15,000/ - per electric / diesel unit and Rs. 50,000/- per solar / wind unit”

Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“6 Water Lifting Devices (Electric, Diesel, wind / Solar) — 50% of the cost of installation limited to Rs. 15,000/ - per electric / diesel unit and Rs. 50,000/- per solar / wind unit”

Only “if and only if a farmer opted to install micro-irrigation System in his/her field” (Annexure XIII), linked to that system and based on the farmer’s actual need (cl. 13.2). States may spend only about 20% of their PDMC funds on these interventions (40% in North East and Himalayan states, J&K and Ladakh) (cl. 7.8), so ask whether your state offers it this year.

“7 Petrol Irrigation Pumps- up to 15 hp — Rs. 10000/unit or 50% of the cost of the system (including installation) whichever is less.”